Peace@Syria & Pentagon (PART 1 OF 3)
(penta02.jpg)
Make Love
Not War!
(beachbg.jpg+heartx.gif+valent6.gif+earthani.gif+2004f.gif)
Kato, how come you suddenly go to politics?
Well... I read Vancouver's Metro News yesterday.
(metro01.gif)
■“Metro News on Web”
Syria Chemical Weapons Attack
<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/EyAqtVqHi1g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Obama presses world leaders
to support a strike on Syria
U.S. president Barack Obama pressed fellow world leaders on Thursday to support a U.S.-led strike on Syria, but he ran into opposition from Rissia, China and even the EU, which condemned the recent chemical weapons attack in Bashar Assad's country but declared it too soon for military action.
...
China's G20 delegation spokesman, Qin Gang, was among those who countered, saying: "War isn't the fundamental way to solve problems in Syria."
The prospect of military action against Syria overshadowed the global growth agenda at the two-day summit, which opened Thursday in the Russian city of St. Petersburg.
Leaders did, however, discuss the crisis during a dinner hosted by Russian President Vladimir Putin, one of the Syrian government's strongest supporters.
SOURCE: metronews.ca
Weekend, Sept. 6-8, 2013
My first reaction is "Oh, not again! No more Irag! No more Afganistan!"
So, Kato, you're against a military attack on Syria even if they find evidences for chemical weapons, aren't you?
Yes, I am. As the Chinese spokesman told, war isn't the fundamental way to solve problems in Syria."
Tell me, Kato, what is the fundamental way to solve problems in Syria.
We have the United Nations to solve international problems, don't we?
Yes, everybody knows that.
As yOu know, Diane, the United Nations is an international organization whose stated aims include promoting and facilitating cooperation in international law, international security, economic development, social progress, human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, political freedoms, democracy, and the achievement of lasting world peace.
That's darn right, Kato.
The UN was founded in 1945 after World War II to replace the League of Nations, to stop wars between countries, and to provide a platform for dialogue. So why don't they use the UN to solve the problem.
But the United States seems to dislike the UN these days.
That's the whole problem. The U.S. tries to solve the problem with Arms, not with talk.
Why is that?
Well ... Wars make money! All Wars are for Profit.
WAKE UP! All Wars are for Profit.
<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/PD3xftAQUfQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Do you really believe that all Wars are for Profit?
Yes, I do. Here are some video clips to prove just that.
HALLIBURTON: WAR AND PROFIT
<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/6KXFHhM2sMw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Halliburton Moves to Dubai
<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Nfg1U3Z0mVM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
What should Canada do if President Obama asks Canada to join the attack?
Well ... I want the prime minister to reject Obama's proposal just as Jean Chretien did on Iraq War.
(To be followed)